PESHAWAR: After the imposition of Governor Rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa under Article 234, a major debate has started in political and administrative circles over whether the new setup will strengthen provincial institutions or violate merit.
Supporters of Governor Rule argue that the Governor, with the help of technocrats and retired bureaucrats in the Advisory Council, can take impartial decisions free from political pressure. They say the Governor can focus on restoring law and order, ensuring good governance, timely completion of development projects, and curbing corruption.
The inclusion of professionals like former FBR Chairman Tariq Pasha and Lt Gen (R) Nigar Johar is being seen as a step towards institutional strengthening.
On the other hand, opposition parties, especially Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, allege that Governor Rule is unconstitutional and its main purpose is political victimization.
They fear that merit will be violated through transfers and postings of officers on political grounds, cancellation of ongoing development projects of the previous government, and appointments of blue-eyed persons in the Advisory Council and other departments.
Constitutional experts say the success of Governor Rule will depend on whether the Governor acts as a neutral constitutional head or as a representative of the federal government.
Under the Constitution, the Governor is expected to uphold merit and run the province in accordance with law. Political analysts believe that the next few weeks will be crucial to determine whether Governor House will become a center of institutional reforms or a hub of political decisions.
Read also: Testing time starts for KP Governor as flour prices further increase
